This is just a quick announcement and gentle reminder: if you ever find yourself reading something of mine — on any topic — and you’re clutching your fist in lamentation at how intolerably wrong I am, please don’t hesitate to reach out so we can have a audio/video conversation! In my experience, real-time conversations are the best way to actually unearth where we differ and avoid getting lost in endless walls of text. The best way to coordinate is by email: ymeskhout@gmail.com.
This would be intended for the public as the whole point is to hash out ideas transparently. If you’re concerned about anonymity, I’m happy to accommodate that however you’d like (I previously went as far as hiring a Nigerian voice actress to redub someone’s entire voice track). I may consider having private conversations, but I’d need a really compelling justification for it to be worthwhile.
I have written a lot and have staked many positions. I am also a fallible human who has been wrong before, but I apparently distinguish myself by being unhesitant about admitting errors. My entire ethos is about seeking truth and being less wrong over time, and honest feedback is a gift.
And just to be clear (because I’ve thought about this myself): your own following or audience size doesn’t matter to me. What matters is thoughtful pushback, not your credentials or platform.
A few quick expectations for reaching out (summarized from here):
Be specific: If you think I’m wrong, point to exactly what and why. Vague “you’re wrong” messages aren’t helpful.
Be concise: Short and to the point is best; long manifestos are less likely to get a timely response.
No credentials required: You don’t need to be an expert or have a big audience-just bring your best argument.
Citation transparency: If we set up a conversation, please send over any sources you plan to rely on ahead of time.
Thanks for reading, and for helping keep me honest.
I thought I made a mistake once, but I was wrong.
Wait, so is that an open invitation to publicly debating you, or can the debates be purely private as well?
The article isn't clear on that.