Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chazz's avatar

I'm not sure if ending your article about how real-time conversations can end badly with an invitation to your adversaries to appear on your podcast is a king-size flex or the worst-placed advertisement ever.

Expand full comment
Justin's avatar

While I agree Tim Pool for sure "owned" Lance, really the question was so obvious, and even the bits leading up to it were, that Lance really just owned himself. You could see this coming from a mile away, it was like Lance had never had a conversation with someone on the subject before.

Also I've come to appreciate some of Destiny's style. I saw a snip of him talking to a Christian pro life guy recently, and he started by focusing in on precisely what the guy had issue with and what should be done about it.

There's this practice in street epistemology called the "real reason" check, where you take a person's stated reason for a belief, ask them if they were satisfied that it didn't apply in the situation or was otherwise not a factor would they still have the same confidence in the belief / claim. It helps when people aren't being 100% upfront and presenting more palatable reasons for a belief, but when a person is being honest, sometimes will reveal to a person things about themselves they didn't even know. (usually when a belief hasn't been interrogated before)

Loved the examples here, but man Meghan is taking a beating here :)

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts